Today, the Council for Agricultural Science and Technology released a report and literature review looking at problems caused by the current system of asynchronous approvals for biotech crops. The paper focuses on the economic effects in countries that are major global commodity exporters and importers. Overall, it concludes that asynchrony in the global approval of new biotech crops and the resultant risk of low level presence puts large volumes of trade worth billions of dollars at risk.
The increasing disparity in the biotech product approval timelines between exporting countries that utilize new technologies and large grain importing countries, in particular, is a significant and growing impediment to trade, specifically in the European Union and China.
As Task Force Chair Dr. Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes said, “How the world’s regulatory systems operate in the area of biotech crops is critically important to producers and consumers.”
The paper shares research regarding the impacts on trade, downstream industries, the adoption of biotech innovations, crop breeding and farm income. It also offers several potential solutions and provides research about approaches that might ease the negative impacts of asynchronous approvals and LLP.
“More research is needed to evaluate the global cost of asynchronous approvals and LLP, the impacts of asynchrony on innovation and crop improvements, and the decision-making process of biotech developers, in both the public and private sectors,” say the authors. “Timely research could inform policymaking and improve the design of policy instruments.”
Many factors influence the approval process including differences in institutional arrangements, regulatory procedures, administrative capacity, and attitudes toward biotech crops. Therefore, the time required to review new biotech events varies significantly from one country to another. But, as this paper concludes, “As long as the current situation persists, agricultural biotechnology will be prevented from delivering the full range of promised benefits of improved standard of living and food security.”
CommonGround is a group of farmers connecting with consumers through conversations about science and research and personal stories about food and misinformation surrounding farming. Supported by the NCGA and state corn organizations.
The Soil Health Partnership (SHP) is a farmer-led initiative that fosters transformation in agriculture through improved soil health. Administered by NCGA the partnership has more than 220 working farms enrolled in 16 states. SHP’s mission is to utilize science and data to partner with farmers who are adopting conservation agricultural practices that improve the economic and environmental sustainability of the farm.
The Corn Utilization and Technology Conference (CUTC) is a biennial event happening this June. Learn more.